عرصه های گذار به مدیریت شهری یکپارچه در ایران با تاکید بر وظایف، کارکردها و صلاحیت‌های شورای شهر و شهرداری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

چکیده

نتایج تحقیقات مختلف در دهه‏های اخیر دربارۀ ابعاد نهادی، مالی و کارکردی مدیریت شهری ایران، بیانگر تداخل مسئولیت‏ها و اختیارات سازمان‏های دولتی و عمومی، ناهماهنگی در ارائۀ خدمات شهری، محدود بودن گستره وظایف و اختیارات نهادهای محلی، ناپایداری منابع مالی، اغتشاش قلمرویی و مشکلات دیگر در نظام مدیریت محلی است. در پاسخ به این مشکلات، راه‏‏حل مناسب در افزایش یکپارچگی در نظام تصمیم‏گیری و اقدام و در قالب «مدیریت شهری یکپارچه» جست‏وجو شده است. در این مقاله از روش‏های مرور تحقیقات و اسناد، مصاحبه و تحلیل محتوا در گردآوری و تحلیل داده‏ها استفاده شده است. عواملی که مدیریت یکپارچۀ شهری را از مدیریت متفرق متمایز می‏کنند، متنوع هستند و ابعاد مختلف قلمرویی، کارکردی، حقوقی، مالی و غیره دارند. در میان این‌ها، شیوۀ توزیع یا تخصیص کارکردها و وظایف، صلاحیت‏ها و مسئولیت‏ها میان دولت مرکزی و مراجع محلی یکی از عرصه‏های مهم تحلیل از نظر یکپارچگی و استقلال عمل در ادارۀ امور محسوب می‏شود. این مقاله نشان می‏دهد چند اصل بنیادین در عرصۀ کارکردی باید مورد تأکید قرار گیرد: نخست) واگذاری وظایف و کارکردهای بیشتر به شورا و شهرداری، به یکپارچگی بیشتر مدیریت شهری و در نتیجه، افزایش کارایی، اثربخشی و پاسخ‌گویی منجر خواهد شد. دوم) شورا و شهرداری، نزدیک‏ترین سطح مدیریت به شهروندان است و از این‌رو، مشروعیت و کارایی بیشتر نسبت به دیگر نهادها و سازمان‏های دولتی در خدمات‏رسانی دارد. سوم) شورا و شهرداری به دلیل مکان‌مبنا بودن، چندکارکردی بودن و انتخابی ‏بودن، بهترین گزینه برای به عهده گرفتن نقش سازمان رهبر، در مدیریت شهری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Areas of transition to integrated urban management in Iran, with emphasizing the duties, functions and competencies of the city council and municipality

نویسندگان [English]

  • Naser Barakpour 1
  • Iradj Asadie 2
1 Professor of Urban Planning Department, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Urban Planning Department, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Our country’s cities and municipalities face numerous social, economic, and environmental problems. According to many experts, the root of an essential part of these problems lies in the inefficiency of the urban planning and management system. The results of various research in recent decades on the institutional, financial, and functional dimensions of urban management in Iran indicate the overlap and interference of responsibilities of state and public organizations, lack of coordination in the provision of municipal services, limited scope and power of local institutions, financial instability, territorial fragmentation, and other problems. Naturally, in response to various institutional, policy, and functional fragmentations, the appropriate solution to increase the integration and coherence in decision-making and action, in the form of “integrated urban management,” has been sought.
Materials and methods
In general, two rational and comprehensive strategies can be adopted to deal with functional fragmentation within cities: a) Merger and integration of all active organizations in cities and the establishment of a large and unified organization that has all responsibilities for planning and management; B) Designation of a significant organization (among organizations active in urban planning and management) to coordinate all plans, programs, and activities of organizations involved in urban planning and management based on a plan which is accepted by all of them. The first strategy, which is radical, requires very large organizational consolidations that are not politically feasible and will face many organizational resistances and legal obstacles. In contrast, the second strategy has a higher capacity for implementation because the existing organizational power structure is largely maintained. Only activities centered on a single agreed plan will be monitored by a significant (lead) organization. Suppose this significant and coordinating organization is called the lead organization due to its role in inter-organizational interactions. In that case, the critical question in implementing this strategy is which organization can or must play the leading role of organizations active in the city to achieve integrated urban management. Based on the arguments presented in this article, compared to all existing organizations, the city council, and the municipality have the most appropriateness for the leadership role of organizations active in urban planning and management. For the current research, we reviewed the existing studies and legal documents and conducted in-depth interviews with city and government managers and executives. These sources were used to obtain data and test the analytical model. Our analytical model is based on an ideal type model.
Findings
This article, which studied the dimension of functional integration in detail, shows that some fundamental principles in this field need to be emphasized: First, delegating more tasks and functions to the council and the municipality will lead to greater integration of urban management and, as a result, greater efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability. Second, the council and the municipality are the closest management level to the citizens and therefore have more legitimacy and efficiency than other state organizations in providing services. Third, it is evident that due to the centralized and sectoral structure of government in Iran and due to the lack of understanding of mutual interests between the municipality and other service institutions, the possibility of automatic formation of coordinating mechanisms and relevant institutions- based on the strategy of the lead organization or voluntary delegation of functions from state organizations to municipalities- will not be possible. Therefore, the only way to achieve this goal is to convince the central government (cabinet and parliament) to change their attitude and issue political and administrative mandates at the highest level to form this type of inter-organizational coordination mechanism. Fourth, a pilot transition to integrated urban management, either through the transfer of responsibilities to municipalities or through the assumption of the role of the lead organization by the council and the municipality, is better to start with metropolitan municipalities due to the need for high organizational capacity. 
Conclusion
Based on the arguments presented in this article, compared to all existing organizations, the city council, and the municipality have the most appropriateness for the leadership role of organizations active in urban planning and management.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • City council
  • municipality
  • functional area
  • integrated urban management
[1] Visseren-Hamakers I.J. Integrative environmental governance: enhancing governance in the era of synergies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2015 June; 14:136-143.
[2] Asadie I, Barakpour N. Lead organization: An appropriate model of integrated urban management in Iran. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning. 2021 feburary; 25 (4):17-30.[In Persian].
[3] Heinelt H, Hlepas NK. Typologies of local government systems. In: Bäck H, Heinelt H, Magnier A. editors. The European mayor. Berlin: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2006: 21-42.
[4] Heinelt H, Hlepas NK. Kuhlmann S, Swianiewicz P. Local government systems: grasping the institutional environment of mayors. In: Heinelt H, Magnier A, Cabria M, Reynaert H. Political leaders and changing local democracy: The European mayor. Palgrave Macmillan; 2018.
[5] Barakpour N, Keivani R. The typology of urban management system in Iran, trend of changes and prospect of reforms. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning.2020 February; 24(4):21-33.[ In Persian].
[6] Ladner A, Keuffer N, Baldersheim H, Hlepas NK, Swianiewicz P, Steyvers K, et al. Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan; 2019.
[7] Ladner A, Keuffer N, Baldersheim H. Measuring local autonomy in 39 countries (1990–2014). Regional & Federal Studies. 2016 Agust; 26(3): 321-357. 
[8] Swianiewicz P. If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? An east European perspective. Local Government Studies. 2010 May; 36(2): 183-203.
[9] Houlberg K. Municipal size, economy and democracy. In: Swianiewicz P. editor. Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute; 2010.
[10] Swianiewicz P, Adam G, Alfonso Z. Territorial reforms in Europe: Does size matter? Territorial amalgamation toolkit. Centre of Expertise for Local Government Reform. Council of Europe. 2017 November.
[11] Shah A, Shah S. The new vision of local governance and the evolving roles of local governments, In: Shah A. (editor) Local Governance in Developing Countries, The World Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2006.
[12] Bevir M. Encyclopedia of governance, Berkeley: University of California; 2007.
[13] Hadi Zonooz B. Pathology of Municipal Revenue System in Iran. 1th ed. Tehran: Tehran Urban Planning and Research Center; 2021: [In Persian].
[14] Council of Europe. European Charter of Local Self-Government. Council of Europe; 2016.
[15] Wilson D, Game C. Local government in the United Kingdom, London: Macmillan; 1998.
[16] Wollmann H. Reforming local leadership and local democracy: The cases of England, Sweden, Germany and France in comparative perspective. Local Government Studies. 2008 March; 34(2): 279-298.
[17] Wollmann H. Local government reforms in (seven) European countries: between convergent and divergent, conflicting and complementary developments. Local Government Studies. 2012 December; 38(1): 41–70.
[18] Barakpour N. Urban governance and the system of city administration in Iran, Urban Planning and Management Conference. Mashhad.2006. [In Persian]. 
 [19] Loughlin M. Local Government in the Modern State. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 1986.
[20] Vaezi S. The criterion of act of authority in administrative law in Iran. Journal of Legal Studies. 2015 August; 7(2):199- 220. [In Persian].
[21] Barakpour N, Asadie I. Urban management and governance. 4th ed. Tehran: University of Art; 2019. [In Persian].
[22] Parrado S. Asssigning competences and functions to local Self-government in four EU member states: A comparative review. Paper prepared for SIGMA (A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union principally financed by the EU); 2005.48p.
[23] Moeinfard M, emadzadeh M, Tabibi M. The study of qualification vulnerability of Islamic councils in Iran’s system of law. Journal of Cooperation and Agriculture. 2018 November; 7 (27):171-192. [In Persian].
دوره 3، شماره 2
تیر 1401
صفحه 70-81
  • تاریخ دریافت: 21 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 18 فروردین 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 26 فروردین 1401
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 27 اردیبهشت 1401