توسعه سیستم جذب منابع اقتصادی در مدیریت شهری تهران مبتنی بر استراتژی‌ مزیت رقابتی ملل و رویکرد ترکیبی تصمیم‌سازی چندمعیاره فازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت شهری، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار مدیریت صنعتی و تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

3 دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

4 دکتری مدیریت تحقیق در عملیات، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تأمین منابع اقتصادی یکی از چالش‏های مهم پیش‏ روی سیاست‏گذاران و برنامه‏ریزان مدیریت شهری است. با توجه به اهمیت نقش کلان‌شهر تهران در اقتصاد شهری و ملّی، پژوهش حاضر به شناسایی پیچیدگی سیستم جذب سرمایۀ اقتصادی مبتنی بر مدل مزیت رقابتی ملل با استفاده از رویکرد ترکیبی تصمیم‏سازی چندمعیارۀ فازی پرداخته است. به این منظور، با مشارکت گروهی برنامه‏ریزان سرمایه‏گذاری اقتصادی شهری در مناطق بیست‏و‏دوگانۀ شهرداری تهران، عوامل کلیدی زیرسیستم‏های تولید، شرایط تقاضا، صنایع پشتیبان و ساختار و نیز سیاست‏های دولت و اتفاقات پیش‏بینی‌نشده با استفاده از تکنیک دلفی دو‌مرحله‏ای و مقایسات زوجی سلسله‌مراتبی فازی استخراج شد. در ادامه، مدل شبکه روابط علّی و معلولی سیستم جذب سرمایۀ اقتصادی با استفاده از رویکرد دیمتل فازی ساختاربندی شد. سپس، مدل سیستم جذب منابع اقتصادی بر مبنای شاخص‏های مرکزیت درجۀ ورودی و خروجی و مرکزیت بینابینی منطبق بر رویکرد تحلیل شبکه‏های اجتماعی مورد تجزیه‌و‌تحلیل قرار گرفت. یافته‏های پژوهش، استراتژی‏های توسعۀ سیستم مدیریت شهری تهران مبتنی بر مزیت رقابتی ملل شامل: توسعۀ مشارکت حاکمیت و دولت با سازمان شهرداری تهران در جذب فرصت‏های سرمایه‏گذاری در مدیریت خدمات شهری؛ هم‏راستایی سیاست‏های حاکمیتی در جذب سرمایه و اعمال سیاست‏های تشویقی بخش خصوصی و جذب سرمایه‏گذار خارجی؛ حفظ امنیت و ثبات به منظور کاهش ریسک سرمایه‏گذاری؛ برنامه‏ریزی در توسعۀ زیرساخت‏های شهری؛ تأمین سرمایه از طریق امکانات صنایع تخصصی و تسهیلات بازار سرمایه؛ به‌کارگیری نیروی انسانی متخصص، توسعۀ دانش ظرفیت‏های منطقه‏ای و توسعۀ پایگاه‏های داده‏های تخصصی فرصت‏های سرمایه‏گذاری در مدیریت شهری تهران را پیشنهاد می‏دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Development of Economic Resource Acquisition System in Tehran Urban Management Based on Strategies of Competitive Advantage of Nations and Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

نویسندگان [English]

  • saeed Ahmadian 1
  • Ahmad Ebrahimi Ebrahimi 2
  • Goshtasb Mozafari 3
  • Marzieh Samadi Foroushani 4
1 Department of Urban Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Industrial and Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD in Higher Education Management, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4 PhD, in Operations Research Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
In developing countries with inefficient economic systems and poor tax systems and without mechanisms of citizen participation in the supply of urban costs, the municipal revenue supply system will incline toward unsustainable income resources. Providing sustainable economic resources is one of the most critical challenges for urban management planners and policy-makers. Considering the importance of the role of Tehran metropolis in the urban and national economy, the present study is aimed to identify the complexity of the economic capital acquisition system based on the "competitive advantage of nations" model and with the participation of the Tehran urban management and investment decision-makers and also to identify the environmental determinant factors and extract the cause-effect relationships of the economic capital acquisition system to find the competitive strategies of the development of the economic resources acquisition system in Tehran urban management.
Materials and methods
The present paper uses the hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approaches, including the two-stage Delphi technique to identify the factors affecting the subsystems of the "competitive advantage of nations" model, the fuzzy AHP to perform the paired comparisons and prioritize the factors, the hybrid fuzzy DEMATEL and SNA (social network analysis) approaches to analyze the network and extract the applied causal relationships. The participants included 12 elites from among the chiefs of the investment offices of the 22 municipal districts of Tehran and the experts introduced by the International Relations & Affairs of Tehran Municipality, who were selected using the purposeful sampling method. The research problem was investigated and analyzed using the fuzzy structure, considering the ambiguity and complexity of the relationships and the available approximate information.
Findings
After the review of the literature on the economic capital acquisition in urban management, based on the "competitive advantage of nations" model, initially, four economic resource acquisition systems (production factors, demand conditions, strategy and structure, and supportive industries), the governmental factors, unpredicted events, and 15 subsystems were determined (Fig.1). In the first stage, a total of 97 factors were ranked and refined (filtered) based on the consensus of the elites and using the Likert scale. In the second stage of the Delphi technique, to provide an opportunity for self-revision and assessment of the opinions of others, we again referred to the elites and, subsequently, a total of 65 factors were finally agreed upon and approved based on the elites' consensus. Figure (2) illustrates the Pareto diagram of the identified influential factors. As can be seen in this figure, the production factors with 18 factors ranked first in terms of the factors affecting the economic resource acquisition and the strategy and structure with 17 factors ranked next to it.
Figure 1- Economic resource acquisition factors system based on the "competitive advantage of nations" model (res: findings)
Figure 2- Pareto diagram of factors affecting the economic resource acquisition based on the "competitive advantage of nations" (res: findings)
The assessment of the effectiveness of the systems showed that the external factors, including the government that is out of the control of the capital acquisition system in urban management, had the highest effectiveness with a weight of 33.8%. Next to it, the competition structure and strategy, with a weight of 33%, were the most influential factors in the capital acquisition in Tehran. Subsequently, the factors of production with a weight of 16.8%, the supportive industries related to urban management with a weight of 8.4%, and domestic demand for urban services in Tehran with a weight of 9% exhibited the lowest effectiveness. By investigating the system and subsystems of the model, it can be concluded that although the elites believed that the factors, which were out of the authority of the urban managers, were among the most critical factors affecting capital acquisition, the role of urban managers is the most important influential factor in those areas that are within the authority of the urban managers. In the next stage, in order to find the key factors, considering the results of paired comparisons of the factors, a total of 30 critical priorities, including 32 influential factors, were selected. Afterward, the 32 identified factors were analyzed using the DEMATEL and SNA approaches to extract the cause-effect relationships and extract the network relationships. Subsequently, to depict the relationship network and analyze the relationships between the factors, the total effect matrix was analyzed with a threshold bound in UCINET software based on the degree centrality index, and betweenness centrality index and, thereby, the relationship network was drawn using NETDRAW software. Figure (3) illustrates the cause-effect relationships of the factors affecting the financial resource acquisition in the Tehran metropolis based on the degree centrality index.
Figure 3- Relationship network of the factors affecting the economic resource acquisition based on the degree centrality index (res: findings) (the magnitude of the nodes has been set based on the magnitude of the degree centrality)
Based on the results of the SNA analysis, using the available expert human forces (P12), the agreement or opposition of the country's political position with the capital acquisition (S23), the probability of the occurrence of war and chaos (O16), and the urban infrastructures in the investment areas (P53) were identified as the causal factors in the network. In addition, the factors of the capital acquisition strategies (S12), the participation of the domestic companies in invested industries (I22), the supply of capital through accessible facilities in specialized industries (P23), the supply of capital through the stock market and OTC facilities for investors (P22), the structure of the demand sector with regard to the needs of the real-person citizens and legal entities of the city (D31) were determined as the most effectible factors. Furthermore, apropos of the factors with a high betweenness centrality, the factors of the capital acquisition strategies (S12), the regional knowledge for foreign investors (P42), the participation of domestic companies in the invested industries (I22), the decision-maker headquarters' convergence and consensus on the spatial marketing strategies (O22), and the innovation in the urban management services-related supplier industries (I12) were identified as the key factors that played a crucial role in the competitive advantage and capital acquisition.
Conclusion
Considering the results of the present study on the development of the economic resources acquisition system based on the "competitive advantage of nations" model in Tehran urban management, the following recommendations are presented by the authors:

Developing the government's collaboration with the municipality in the acquisition of investment opportunities in urban management;
Coordinating the governmental position and policies with the investment acquisition and applying incentive policies for the private sector and attracting foreign investors;
Maintaining security and stability to reduce the risk of war and increase the attractiveness of urban investment;
Planning for the development of the infrastructures required for the acquisition of investments in urban services;
Supplying the required capital through specialized industrial facilities and capital market facilities and the participation of the companies working in the field of the opportunities of investment of different industries in urban services;
Using specialized human forces for the acquisition of investment opportunities in urban management;
Compiling the capital acquisition strategies in urban services in an integrated form through strategic planning of urban management;
Developing the regional knowledge and accessible specialized data on the investment opportunities in urban management;
The convergence and consensus of the decision-maker headquarters on the spatial marketing strategies and urban branding;
Providing the ground for innovations in the urban management services-related supplier industries.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Economic resource supply
  • Social network analysis (SNA)
  • Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
  • Competitive advantage nations model
  • Urban management
  1. Antón A, Boyd R, Elizondo A, Ibarrarán ME. Universal social insurance for Mexico: modeling of a financing scheme. Economic Modelling. 2016 Jan 1;52:838-50.
  2. Khmel V, Zhao S. Arrangement of financing for highway infrastructure projects under the conditions of Public–Private Partnership. IATSS research. 2016 Mar 1;39(2):138-45. 
  3. Vossughi F, Mozaffari G, Papoli Yazdi MH, Hataminejad H. Proposal of Financing the Revenue System of Municipalities and Proposing a Framework (Case Study: Tehran Municipality). Geographical Researches Quarterly Journal. 2017 Mar 10;31(4):24-44.
  4. Bruno A, Fontana F. Testing the smart city paradigm in Italian mid-sized cities: An empirical analysis. Housing Policy Debate. 2021 Jan 2;31(1):151-70. 
  5. Russell MG, Smorodinskaya NV. Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018 Nov 1;136:114-31. 
  6. Snieska V, Zykiene I. City attractiveness for investment: characteristics and underlying factors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015 Dec 1;213:48-54. 
  7. Tsai PH, Chen CJ, Yang HC. Using Porter’s Diamond Model to Assess the Competitiveness of Taiwan’s Solar Photovoltaic Industry. Sage Open. 2021 Jan;11(1):2158244020988286. 
  8. Elnably M, Mansour Y, Assem A, Elsisy A. City Branding Through Porter’s Competitive Models: Investigating El Shorouk City Market Position. InArchitecture and Urbanism: A Smart Outlook 2020 (pp. 387-399). Springer, Cham.
  9. Yu TF, Gu CL. Influential factors combination and competitive advantages in stages of urban competitiveness. Chinese Geographical Science. 2004 Sep;14(3):202-8.
  10. Porter ME. New global strategies for competitive advantage. Planning Review. 1990 Mar 1. 
  11. Glebova IS, Khamidullina AM, Anisimova EA. Correlation of balanced socio-economic development of the city and its attractiveness (in the case of Russian cities with population over a million citizens). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015 Feb 28;6(1 S3):284-. 
  12. Middleton, A.C. (2011) City branding and inward investment. In: K. Dinnie (ed.) City Branding, Theory and Cases. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–26.
  13. Zhang Q, Mu R, Zhang Z, Hu Y, Liu C, Zhang L, Yu X. Competitiveness evaluation of high-quality manufacturing development in the yangtze river economic belt. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2020 Sep;15(6):875-83. 
  14. Chiu YH, Lee MS, Wang JW. Culture-led urban regeneration strategy: An evaluation of the management strategies and performance of urban regeneration stations in Taipei City. Habitat International. 2019 Apr 1;86:1-9. 
  15. Jafari A, Hasanpour E, Mirabi VR, Ahmadi F. Study and Analysis of the Role of External Factors of the National Diamond Model by Michael Porter in Get, preservation and Development of Competitive Power (Case Study: Ports and Maritime of Bushehr). Journal of Transportation Research. 2019 Jul 23;16(2):55-73..[In Persian].
  16. Saraei MH, Afsharipoor M. Evaluation of medical tourism structure based on Porter’s Diamond model in Mashhad metropolis. urban tourism. 2018 Oct 23;5(3):117-30..[In Persian].
  17. Rajiv S. Competitiveness analyses of competitive advantage using Porter Diamond model (the case of MSMEs in Himachal Pradesh). An International Business Journal. 2017. 
  18. Ortiz-Barrios, M., Cabarcas-Reyes, J., Ishizaka, A. et al. A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for selecting a sustainable supplier of forklift filters: a case study from the mining industry. Ann Oper Res 307, 443–481 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03737-y
  19. Akbarzadeh, Z., Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., Madhoushi, M., Aghajani, H. (2019). A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Model Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL with Fuzzy Analytical Network Process and Interpretative Structural Model for Prioritizing LARG Supply Chain Practices. International Journal of Engineering, 32(3), 413-423.
  20. Mehregan MR, Jamporazmey M, Hosseinzadeh M, Mehrafrouz M. Proposing an approach for evaluating e-learning by integrating critical success factor and fuzzy AHP. InInternational conference on innovation, management and service, Singapore 2011 Sep.
  21. Azar, A., rajabzadeh ghatromi, A., akhavan, A. Mapping Sustainable Production Model Using ISM and Fuzzy DEMATEL. Industrial Management Studies, 2017; 15(46): 1-26. doi: 10.22054/jims.2017.7986.[In Persian].
  22. Mohammadi Kangarani H, Hosseinzadeh M. Investigating the structure and distribution of power among the institutions in charge for the Fifth Development Plan using Social Network Analysis approach. Public Policy. 2017 Feb 19;2(4):89-107.[In Persian].
دوره 3، شماره 3
شهریور 1401
صفحه 6-21
  • تاریخ دریافت: 21 فروردین 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 26 اردیبهشت 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 18 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 18 خرداد 1401